Except when I got to the gym tonight I had two left shoes, but alas not two left feet. I had brought the left shoe from both the 12.5 and 13. Uh-oh. No running today, and nothing I could do about it.
Rather than just go home, I put the left 13 on my right foot and decided to lift weights only. Upper body, no legs (didn't want to push on the unstable shoes). I hate lifting. I always have - in junior high, high school and now. But I know it is very helpful. Last time I was in serious marathon shape I said that my biggest weakness wasn't my cardio or legs - it was a lack of upper body and core strength. And that next time I ran a marathon, I'd be stronger. And I'd lift more - even at the expense of running and cardio. Actually, it helps prevent over training my legs really. I decided I'd lift 10 minutes for every 30 I ran. Thus, an hour run would mean that I lift weights for 20 minutes. I thought that, on average, I'd end up running 45 minutes, lift weights for 15.
Hasn't worked out that way yet, but I have lifted more. Can't say I see any difference yet. But I know I will be thankful come November for all of these bench presses, rows and cables.
So I was all excited to run 5 miles at 8:00 pace only to have to slug through a 45 minute lift session instead. I am so beat that it is hard to type.
But its good for me, right?
You don't have reversible feet? Unfortunate...
ReplyDeleteFor me also it's far too easy to justify skipping weights because of short-term considerations (e.g. effects on upcoming workouts or races, due to longer complete recovery time) - and I actually like weights! I have to constantly remind myself that the long-term goals are key. I'm also convinced of the positive effects of leg weights (maybe only twice a week) on the connective tissue of the leg and thus on reducing my likelihood of running injury. And I know it will have a speed effect as well in the long term. It's just that I know I will feel it on the next day's run. But that's the point, I guess.